My Favorite Defense of Mr Mann

“Mann’s work has been proven time and time again to not be fraudulent because it has been reproduced by others.”.

My Usual reply:

Why, Yes! It has been reproduced…BUT the question is – Why would you want to reproduce it?
Ha ha ha ha 🙂

Watts Up With That?

Following yesterday’s first look at emails from the 2 year effort to get NOAA to release emails from FOIA requests, where we learn that some scientists felt ‘Hit on the head with a hockey stick’ and that “The paleodata always got a lot more attention from the general public than it deserved.”.

There’s a great article today at SPPI today Michael Mann — the ghost of climate past which summarizes the whole hockey stick affair quite well. It draws heavily on a post from May of this year on PJ Media by Rand Simberg titled The Death of the Hockey Stick?

In that post I found this little nugget below from December 2009, one that I apparently missed in the furor immediately following Climategate1. I’m now correcting that oversight.


What is it? It’s the hockey stick recreated in Excel, using proxy data and instrumental data freely available on the…

View original post 926 more words

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to

  1. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your blog? My blog is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would truly benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this okay with you. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s