It seems the reporting of Gleick as being cleared of forgery by some unknown investigation is now being un-cleared. See here for the original post.
Lol, too funny. It now seems the article has been withdrawn. It was taken down shortly after I tweeted her.
@suzyji read your Gleick article…. no sources for article? Did you and Gleick just invent this, too?
Though, I don’t know if one has anything to do with the other. It’s just the timing that I’m noting.
I went to the Pacific Institute….. nothing there on it. I even went to DeSmear…. nothing there either.
This link…… http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/20/peter-gleick-cleared-heartland once took me here…….
Now, we get this…..
I don’t know what happened, I’m sure it was an honest mistake about something…… but, this sure looks bad.
UPDATE!! Thanks to reader Kim, I did a little research on the corespondent who reported this ……… story?…
View original post 127 more words